Did you know?

0. They are produced at two different factories and have slightly different chemical make up. The same difference you`ll find between any two powders from two different makers with similar burn rate. They are not produced to be copys of each other, but to have similar burn rates only. IMR was recently produced in Canada and Hodgdons "H" …I’m using IMR4350 with great results, 41.6 grains and 143 gr Hornady ELD-X is averaging .56 inch for a 5 shot group at 100 yards. I’m also having good luck with RL16 and 140 gr Speer Gold Dots. Only one …5,081 28. Apr 14, 2013 #2. Steve, That powder is intended to duplicate the IMR 4350, so I think you'll find that it will serve you well, at about the same charge level that you were using with the IMR version. Work up from a grain or so below the IMR 4350 level you were using, and search for the accuracy node.

Has anyone here tried the new Enduron line from IMR? The IMR4451 is stated to be temperature stable and a replacement for the elusive H4350.I would think H4350 and R-17 would work for bigger bullets in the 7-08 around 150 to 162ish. I think theyre a little too slow burning for 120-140s IMO. Thanks Patton243, as you mentioned I want it for the heavier bullets really, on the lighter ones I'm pretty well set, I'm curious which one to try first or try both. Thanks again.I’m using IMR4350 with great results, 41.6 grains and 143 gr Hornady ELD-X is averaging .56 inch for a 5 shot group at 100 yards. I’m also having good luck with RL16 and 140 gr Speer Gold Dots. Only one 5 shot group but it was under .5 inch. Re: IMR4350 vs H4350 in 6.5 Creedmoor. centershot # 14637182 03/06/20.Based on the Hodgdon site info for the 4350 powders compared in the same conditions try dropping Barnes IMR data 2.0gr on both ends, (61.5gr - 68.0gr) I have shot the 338WM with a 210 Partition and 74.0gr of RL-19 with good results. I haven't tried the Barnes bullets in the 338WM in any combination. 3.I haven't tried H4350 with a 165 gr. bullet as of yet in my 30-06 but two years ago I shot a cow elk with the 165 gr. Nosler AccuBond using W760 and the elk died. Bullet entered in the ribs on the right side and destroyed the left lung. Elk went maybe 30 yards, laid down and died. Rifle FN Mauser custom, 24" barrel.

Feb 10, 2009. #4. The 2008 hodgdons manuel lists imr 4350 as 91 st on a burn rate scale with h4350 as 92nd, it also lists a starting load for a 180 gr 30-06 as 52 gr h 4350 and 53 gr of imr 4350 .so starting with a low end load should be safe. 300 win mag 180 gr. starting imr 4350 63 gr imr 4350 66 gr.Alex. 3.The Pennyrile of Kentucky. I finally got around to trying the IMR4350 powder in my 6.5. Loaded up 40 grains with a 120 grain Sierra SP, Hornady brass and a CCI primer. Five shots measured .9 at a 100 yards, very mild shooting load. Then I went up to 41.8 grains, and tried both the Sierra and a 120 Nosler BT. ….

Reader Q&A - also see RECOMMENDED ARTICLES & FAQs. Imr 4350 vs h4350. Possible cause: Not clear imr 4350 vs h4350.

Did see a few threads on this but they were quite dated. Pulled the trigger …Oct 16, 2022 · The 180 Gr is on the heavy side for the 7RM, H-4350 is probably a too fast burning powder for that bullet weight. A more appropriate powder would be IMR-8133, Ramshot Magnum ,even Retumbo. With these slower burning powders make sure your neck tension is set properly, this will help with inconsistent velocity’s, CBTO will also aid a lot. Aug 5, 2011 · IMR 4350 vs H4350 Jager1 Aug 5, 2011 Aug 5, 2011 #1 Jager1 Beginner Sep 23, 2010 71 0 I was just wondering how these two powders compare. I have an IMR 4350 load worked up for my 300 WSM but would like to try one of Hodgdon extreme powders. Can I consider these two powders the same as far charge weight goes?

They are basicaly the same powder. there made from the same recipe. Keep in mind that alot of aa powders are surplus powder repackaged but then h4350 was origanaly a surplus powder itself. When hodgdon introduced it they were selling surplus and the newer stuff is made to the same specs as the original.Oct 25, 2014 · L. Joined: May 2005. Posts: 6,392. Pikeville, TN. It is close, but not identical to either. I used it with good results for a while before standardizing on H4350. Re: Accurate 4350 vs IMR 4350. kenster99 # 9305568 11/02/14. Joined: Oct 2014. So well, that it is hard to tell the difference. Groups are excellent and I would be very confident in either one. In fact, I had settled on IMR 4350 based on availability but found...

how to get debug stick in minecraft IMR 4350 is my favorite powder for my 30-06 and 375 H&H. But it’s not always available, and sometimes H4350 is. Also some reloading manuals don’t have data for both, but usually one or the other. So my question is, can I use Hodgon data for IMR powder and vise versa, or is there to much difference.I also have for years taken for granted that basically AA-4350 and IMR-4350 data was interchangeable and have used data as such. But if you REALLY look at reloading data and burn-rate charts, no one agrees with powder burn rates and this includes the 4350s. Here are where the authorities place the 4350s: Hodgdon 82. IMR4350 83. H4350 84. scott county inmate listoreillys texas city 5,471. H4350 is slightly slower than IMR 4350, for me it has always given better velocity than the original Dupont formula in cases with greater capacity than 30-06, it is what I use in the 06 Ackley Improved right now with 150 gr bullets. I believe Hodgdon finally introduced their canister 4350 about 1984 or so. funeral home estill sc Bugger, Both IMR4350 and H4350 vary slightly in burn-rate from lot to lot, but overall I've been using exactly the same charges as IMR4350 since starting to use H4350 at least 15 years ago, with very similar results in both accuracy and velocity in cartridges from the .243 Winchester to .375 H&H. qpublic putnambrood basset rescuerelationship bf initials on nails Chronograph Results with Temps from 23° F to 101°. Here are chronograph results of a comparison test between IMR 4451 and H4350. Rick’s rifle was cleaned and allowed to cool between each test. Five fouling shots were fired before each test. Important: Note that for both Test #1 and Test #2, the powder order is reversed in the mid-temp ... patient portal chase brexton H 4350 is AR 2209. When first released in the 80's, it was a about 5% faster than IMR 4350. When ADI got the contracts of supply to Hodgdon, it changed the burning rate to slightkly slower than IMR which hurt no-one and made the powder more flexible in a lot of magnums so it was an improved product in the market place.IMR 4350 and H4350 are smokeless and slow-burning rifle powders. They’re suitable for use in the sports and firearm industry. Although both gunpowders differ and the usage will depend on the purpose of your shot, you can use IMR4350 as an alternative to H4350. The reason is that H4350 is usually scarce … See more gun dog central classifiedsdbd rank reset rewardsbedford gazette obits Dec 1, 2011 · Available now as the original IMR 4350, Hodgdon’s H4350 and Accurate Arms’ 4350, the potential for confusion is obvious." Also, if you click on the MSDS sheet for either IMR4350 or H4350, you are directed to the exact same page: MSDS AR2209 is H4350, is IMR4350, is AA4350...all the same powder, made in the same plant, packaged in different ... Posts: 1,753. To summarize what has been said, 4064 and its near twin brother 4895 are mid burning rate powders and more efficient with 150 and 168 bullet weights, while 4350 is a lower burning rate powder and more efficient with the heavier 180 and 200 grain bullets. Note that 47 gr 4895 as well as 4064 are common loadings for the …